Recycling for Cobalt, Lithium Low Despite Importance to Climate Change Fight
Despite clear environmental and economic benefits, lithium and cobalt recycling rates are low, says a study released by the International Institute for Sustainable Development.
Demand for minerals in electric vehicles, solar panels and wind turbines predicted to exceed supply this decade
OTTAWA, APRIL 3, 2019 – Extracting cobalt and lithium from old products and infrastructure is essential to heading off predicted metal shortfalls, empowering clean energy transitions and reducing risk of human exploitation.
Despite these benefits, lithium and cobalt recycling rates are low, says a study released by the International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
Sustainability and Second Life: The Case for Cobalt and Lithium Recycling notes interest in renewable technologies (such as electric vehicles, solar panels and wind turbines) has increased demand for cobalt and lithium. However, global supplies of both minerals are not projected to meet demand, with research forecasting shortfalls in the coming decade.
Recycling conducted in a responsible and transparent way could help head off these shortfalls while reducing pressure on mining communities vulnerable to exploitation. However, recycling rates remain low due to a lack of transparency in recycling supply chains; manufacturers purchasing substitute minerals due to high prices for raw cobalt and lithium; and inefficient collection of cobalt and lithium from existing infrastructure, to name a few.
“It’s a balance. We have to meet demand for a green energy shift while protecting human rights,” said Clare Church, Research Officer at IISD and lead author of the report. “Recycling can play a key role in achieving these goals, and we hope our study prompts action to drive those rates up.”
Sustainability and Second Life: The Case for Cobalt and Lithium Recycling’s recommendations include:
- Increased transparency and responsible sourcing along primary and recycling supply chains
- Enhancing the eco-design of products containing lithium and cobalt
- Raising consumer awareness regarding current collection and recycling schemes
- New or revised investments to improve collection infrastructure, technology development and knowledge creation
- Clearly designating the actors responsible and liable for recycling materials
“Recycling has long been a central tenet in circular business models and sustainable development,” said Church. “Adopting recycling in the mining sector and in supply chains is essential to ensure the transition to a low-carbon economy is responsible and sustainable for the longer term.”
About IISD
The International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD) is an award-winning independent think tank working to accelerate solutions for a stable climate, sustainable resource management, and fair economies. Our work inspires better decisions and sparks meaningful action to help people and the planet thrive. We shine a light on what can be achieved when governments, businesses, non-profits, and communities come together. IISD’s staff of more than 250 experts come from across the globe and from many disciplines. With offices in Winnipeg, Geneva, Ottawa, and Toronto, our work affects lives in nearly 100 countries.
You might also be interested in
Promoting the Development of Agricultural Cooperatives
Governments in the Global South should promote agricultural cooperatives to boost smallholder access to fair markets, finance, and climate resilience.
COP 29 Outcome Moves Needle on Finance
In the last hours of negotiations, concerted pressure from the most vulnerable developing countries resulted in an improved outcome on the finance target, with a decision to set a goal of at least USD 300 billion per year by 2035 for developing countries to advance their climate action.
Stabilization Clauses: The hidden provisions that can hinder tax and investment policy reform
Stabilization clauses should no longer automatically be included in contracts between states and investors. If they are, they should, at a minimum, build on the latest international standards on stabilization to avoid being a barrier to sustainable development.
Why Trade Matters in the Plastic–Pollution Treaty Negotiations
The global push to end plastic pollution by 2040 highlights the critical intersection of trade and environmental action, with upcoming INC-5 negotiations focusing on reducing plastic production, consumption, and waste within a fair and effective international framework.