Revisiting Tax Incentives as an Investment Promotion Tool: Q&A for investment policy-makers
Do tax incentives effectively attract investment in developing countries?
Tax incentives have, for many years, been considered essential investment promotion tools. Since the early 2000s, however, their effectiveness has been brought into question. Policy-makers, including those responsible for investment law and policy frameworks, have responded by tightening the governance of tax incentives by shortening the duration of incentives or requiring that investors meet additional performance requirements, for example. While this is a valuable and worthwhile exercise, the actual utility and effectiveness of tax incentives have been less explored by governments.
This Q&A is intended to update the investment community on the evolution of tax incentives as an investment promotion tool. It revisits the foundational premises surrounding the use of tax incentives at a time when rapidly changing international tax and investment norms are challenging their continued effectiveness. It builds on an earlier policy brief published by the International Institute for Sustainable Development in 2012 titled Rethinking Tax Incentives, as well as more recent work on the interaction between tax incentives and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/G20 global minimum tax.
You might also be interested in
Stabilization Clauses: The hidden provisions that can hinder tax and investment policy reform
Stabilization clauses should no longer automatically be included in contracts between states and investors. If they are, they should, at a minimum, build on the latest international standards on stabilization to avoid being a barrier to sustainable development.
What Drives Investment Policy-makers in Developing Countries to Use Tax Incentives?
The article explores the reasons behind the use of tax incentives in developing countries to attract investment, examining the pressures, challenges, and alternative strategies that exist.
Model Inter Se Agreement to Neutralize the Survival Clause of the Energy Charter Treaty Between the EU and Other non-EU Contracting Parties
An analysis of how the European Union (EU) and other contracting parties of the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT) could modify the treaty among themselves to neutralize the survival clause and prevent future fossil fuel investment arbitrations.
What Will Happen at COP 29?
Talks at the 2024 UN Climate Change Conference (COP 29) will range from defining a way forward on finance through a new collective quantified goal (NCQG) to mitigation, and loss and damage. Ahead of negotiations in Baku, IISD’s Earth Negotiations Bulletin Team Lead Jennifer Bansard examines the agenda and breaks down what to watch as eyes turn to Azerbaijan.