The Proposed Foreign Pollution Fee Act
The recent amendment to the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Foreign Pollution Fee Act, proposes charges on carbon-intensive imports. This analysis delves into the bill's details, expressing concerns about its complexity, excessive discretionary power, and a perceived emphasis on geopolitics over global climate protection.
-
Aaron Cosbey analyzes the proposed #ForeignPollution Fee Act, emphasizing its challenges in administration, the excessive discretionary powers, and its focus on geopolitical interests over global climate protection.
-
U.S. legislators aim to align #TradePolicy with climate goals through the Foreign Pollution Fee Act. However, @AaronCosbey's analysis highlights complexities, excessive discretion, and geopolitical priorities that could hinder its effectiveness in addressing global #climatechange.
-
With a focus on protecting U.S. producers, does the Foreign Pollution Fee Act truly prevent carbon leakage, or could it inadvertently hinder global efforts to mitigate climate change? @AaronCosbey unpacks the key elements of the Act.
In the realm of U.S. legislative initiatives addressing climate change and trade policy, Senators Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.), and Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) have introduced the Foreign Pollution Fee Act. This legislative proposal aims to levy charges on imports with higher carbon intensity than their U.S. counterparts. The bill has garnered attention for its potential to succeed where other border carbon adjustment proposals have faltered. However, this analysis reveals complex administrative challenges, broad discretionary powers, and a focus on geopolitical positioning and protecting domestic industries over global climate mitigation.
Participating experts
You might also be interested in
Senegal's Big LNG Gamble
This report explores Senegal's nascent liquefied nitrogen gas (LNG) industry by assessing the impacts associated with a new fossil fuel-based industry on the country's environment, economy, and society. It does this by responding to three questions: What have been the impacts of the development of LNG on Senegal to date? Is it viable for Senegal to invest further into an industry that is projected to decline? What risks can Senegal expect should it forge ahead with its LNG development plans?
Public Financial Support for Renewable Power Generation and Integration in the G20 Countries
G20 governments provided at least USD 168 billion in public financial support for renewable power in 2023, less than one third of G20 fossil fuel subsidies that year.
Unlocking Clean Power for All
This report uses tipping point theory to advise where public funding can be strategically directed to catalyze renewable energy deployment in developing and emerging economies.
G20 Governments are Spending Three Times as Much on Fossil Fuels as Renewables
G20 governments are spending three times as much on fossil fuels as renewables, research by the International Institute for Sustainable Development shows.